AI policy & governance
Purpose, scope, principles, roles, responsibilities, alignment with strategy and code of ethics.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · AI governance
ISO 42001 does not require a separate ISMS. It requires extending the existing one with AI impact assessment, model lifecycle, data quality and human oversight. In 10 weeks you have an AI governance system that holds up under audit — and prepares the ground for the EU AI Act.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the international standard for managing AI systems responsibly. KodeX GRC extends your existing ISO 27001 ISMS with AI impact assessment, model lifecycle, data quality and human oversight — covering the 38 Annex A controls — in about 10 weeks, mapped to the EU AI Act.
Annex A of ISO 42001 is organised around an AI system's lifecycle — from purpose and governance to retirement. Each area maps to an owner and an artefact.
Purpose, scope, principles, roles, responsibilities, alignment with strategy and code of ethics.
Impacts on individuals, groups, society. Mandatory for high-risk systems under the EU AI Act.
Design, data, training, validation, deployment, in-production monitoring, retirement.
Provenance, quality, representativeness, bias, dataset governance.
Model documentation, model cards, user disclosure, communication of limitations.
Human-in-the-loop checkpoints, intervention rights, kill-switch procedure.
Model suppliers, APIs, third-party integration, AI supply chain risk assessment.
Detection, reporting, correction, learning. Distinguished from conventional security incidents.
The standard adds value when there's real exposure or regulatory interest — not when AI is a pilot activity.
We work with companies that use AI in a product or in a decision that affects people — customers, employees, citizens.
The rule: if the company processes training data, produces predictions that feed into a decision, or exposes AI to clients, the standard has meaning. If AI is only an internal productivity tool, usually not yet.
Four phases. The work is smaller than ISO 27001 because it doesn't start from zero — it builds on the ISMS already in place.
Which systems, what risk
Inventory of every AI system, classification under the EU AI Act, mapping of training and operational data flows.
2 weeksBefore we write policies
Structured impact assessment on individuals and society. The basis for policies and subsequent decisions.
3 weeksLayered onto the existing ISMS
Extend your policies with the AI chapters. No duplicate documents — one source of truth, multiple mappings.
3 weeksAnd audit support
Dry run, finding closure, presence at Stage 1 and Stage 2 with the auditor's eyes on what they'll look for.
2 weeksFive artefacts directly linked to the existing management system. None of them are documents you'll have to write yourself afterwards.
Typical project layered onto an existing ISMS. Without ISO 27001, the work combines with the foundational project and extends to 14 weeks.
The questions we hear before taking on an AI governance project.
Not mandatory, but it helps significantly. Around 70% of ISO 42001 controls have counterparts in ISO 27001 — governance, risk management, policies, internal audit, management review. If you have it, the project halves. If not, we combine with the foundational project.
The standard doesn't replace the regulation. It provides the governance framework the AI Act presupposes — especially for impact assessment, model documentation, human oversight and risk management. The classification we do in step i maps to the AI Act's risk categories.
It depends on the number of AI systems in scope and whether an ISMS already exists. After the free gap analysis you get a costed proposal — not before. We don't quote without seeing what's actually there.
If your product includes AI and sells to regulated or enterprise clients who ask for AI governance evidence, yes. If AI is only an internal productivity tool, usually not yet — unless a specific client asks for it.
ISO 42001 rarely stands alone. It usually combines with the following, because they share artefacts and maturity level.
The foundation that halves the ISO 42001 effort — and the evidence clients ask for.
08 · vCISOFor continuity — AI committee, board reporting, annual review, impact assessment refresh.
04 · GDPROverlaps in data governance, impact assessments and cross-border transfers.
A prioritised gap register, a costed 10-week roadmap, and an executive summary for the board. No commitment — you can hand it to another consultant if you prefer.